by Olen Follow us @RegulatorSolutions on Gab

Link to , Regulator.Solutions FB post here Check out our new hoodie from , Cold Dead Hands . No Bill of Attainder shall be passed - Article 1 section 9 US Constitution

Which cancels the arguments made by Atheists that your rights come by privilege granted by man via evolution. And I am going to come back to application of Attainder principles and how they are being flagrantly violated. So hold that thought a minute while I throw up some more targets.

The Laws and statutes of the United States Constitution are the supreme law of the land - Article 6 of the US Constitution

The only way atheists enjoy the basic human rights protected by the Constitution are by the grace of God. Or perhaps a more myopic view would be to say that it is by the grace of Godly people that allow unGodly people the same rights.

“The citizens of each state are entitled to the immunities and privileges of all citizens in every state” Article 4 section 2

In short, I don’t mind an argument that our basic human rights come from a source other than God, but by all means let’s see who or what your source is and the evidence?

An atheist can steal the premise to have a right to argue. And I may be inclined to lend them my right to do so. But the reverse logic is incoherent in application. I may as well surrender my mind to Joseph Goebbles and allow Josef Mengele to practice medicine on my body. Such would be the result of adopting the position of an atheist to defend the basis for having human rights that have no basis for any Right to lend to anyone.

So by all means, atheists, flagrantly steal and cherry pick from my beliefs all you like to prop up your own with. All you do is validate what I confirm is true while invalidating your own contradicting claims.

After all, what entity are you going to credit for endowing me with basic human rights? Man, or nature, since you disbelieve in Nature’s God? If you want to try the Harris hat trick of Nature via darwinism, feel free to try while you have the temporary privilege to do so in a world view that assumes your morals and rights and anything inherent to your nature, are evolving to only further promote the species of the fittest.

And what happens when your culture and its traditions are found to not be fitting? Pass your next ex post facto decree, to move your moral goal posts out of reach and have your excuse to abuse someone as the fascion of the day dictates?

Just ignore such laws are prohibited by the same clause in the constitution that also prohibits guilt and punishment for the sins of your fathers.

You cannot be punished for the crimes of your ancestors , is another simple way of understanding the phrase “No Bill of Attainder” which also confers the guilt of "corruption of blood" on the families of the accused.

But you know this is a basic human right, being violated every day in every way the left can throw a stone at? I already know certain people are asking me to check my white privilege already. I am just wondering what category their appropriated european marxist privileges fall under to be allowed to oppress the rights of others based on creeds, classes, and colors?

Should we discuss slave reparation's, what culture is without guilt? Or perhaps something a little more modern when it comes to excuses to end the Life and deprive Liberty from humans that have not been born?

And in nearly every instance I get into that argument over abortion, someone will inevitably make a moral plea for why it is good to kill a baby to make someone else happy.

And I am not talking about the low hanging fruit of a politician telling lower class people to abort their babies so inflation isn’t as bad . But don’t try to tell me that democrats aren't flagrant fascists.

As I recently and bluntly told the last person that made such a plea based on the special circumstance of a baby produced through rape; no one becomes a better person by killing a baby.

But of course, we don’t want to think about appropriate punishment for the rapist. And who I have yet to hear of getting the death penalty for rape in this day and age in our country. Instead, a baby gets the death penalty without the basic human right of Due Process provided in the 5th amendment of the bill of rights. While a rapist, gets coddled by society.

And my sensibilities are manipulated and assaulted by someone trying to hold hostage one victim for the sake of the other victim by...psychopaths that will turn and argue for the human treatment of people that made the willing choice to forfeit their life by actions that were made in disregard for the sake of others.

I know, that was a lot. But think about what I said in that last paragraph for just a minute?

17 kids were murdered at the Parkland School in Florida, their shooter captured alive, stood trail, and did not get the death penalty…

But a baby from rape has no one to defend them from being killed without due process?

And yet our constitution says, “No Bill of Attainder.”

Just think about that a minute…

And think about this too; What if rapists faced a death penalty that was to be carried out no later than 9 months after conviction in a manner that babies are aborted in? Pulled apart piece by piece or bathed in acid or stabbed through the brainstem and spinal cord with scissors. The last example being the applied technique of Doctors practicing the legacy of Mengele on babies that survive abortions.

It was God alone and from the beginning saying otherwise for us to live. While giving us the knowledge and tools to make such a choice possible. And He recorded it in the bible by His servants for the world to witness for thousands of years later that offered the escape from the penalty of sins of our fathers. And there is no other Way for Life in Truth than by His Son.

And truer words were never spoken than when Jesus said, “Know the truth and the truth will set you free.”

Our Founders stood on and proclaimed these… certain… and self evident truths for us about Inalienable Rights and became examples for how to defend them. Truths that are founded on biblical bed rock foundations that established the laws still in function today… which are being violated by hostage takers that are gaslighting people into becoming slaves and victims.

And which are you electing to become by the choices you make which determine your outcome? A psychopathic hostage taker telling you that your human rights are a social construct as are your gender and your very identity? You have been robbed of your very mind, body, and spirit by such dogmas in practice.

Yet it was Jesus who said, a good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep but a hireling will flee. And it was also my Lord who said it is better for a millstone to be tied around your neck and drowned at sea than to cause a child to sin.

I know there is a misconception that Jesus was a coward who would never fight or lift a hand against His enemies.

No, He merely showed as God that it wasn’t necessary for Him to do so, and His preference was to give kindness and mercy to people that most needed it.

But you and I are no gods and cannot offer ourselves and others better alternatives. Much as we may pretend when making judgements against God and man for the sake of what makes us able to live with ourselves and dictate to others.

I was speaking recently with a colleague. Their child had asked them, why they didn’t do more to save peoples lives. And my broken hearted co-worker could not think of a good response.

A thousand thoughts went through my mind, namely how many times I faced that accusation when it was my own inner demons and the answer was, “I did everything that could be done in my power without breaking any laws.”

The rest of the outcome was in God’s Hands…

Three nails later and it really didn’t take me long from that point to see the perspective God must have when people accuse Him of the same. Especially when I have had to stand and give account for my actions.

God did that for me already through His Son. The only thing waiting for me was to surrender to Him to avoid a lot of suffering from my own hands.

But I have found such guilt only comes from a source without mercy and through hypocrisy and cowardice. Even and especially when it was feelings of my own self guilt to make me my own judge, jury, and executioner.

But what do you say to a child who is spun around by media and friends alike pressuring them to fall into that line of belief? No doubt, you are in a hostage situation and you have my prayers, because I have been there a lot.

Don’t let your children adopt the ways of the world when God has a better alternative by the Word.

And I am watching the education and arguments spinning around the EMS field and among first responders for how to react to the daily threats we face. And I do not see a good path away from God.

In the same time frame I read a post from my brother, Patrick James on the Cold Dead Hand page advocating for teachers to be armed and trained to respond to “active shooters.” I skimmed through comments and caught one knucklehead trying to poo poo on the discussion. Whether he was a troll or really sincere I could not tell from his comment arguing that teachers had no business doing so because they are overworked and underfunded.

Cops may have an argument from the Supreme Court for having No Duty to Act, but I know of a bunch that are having a hard time living with themselves after following orders that took them down that path.

Because the mobs are looking to blame everyone but themselves for "not doing more."

I recently read an article after the shooting in Uvalde calling for medics to be armed and charge into those situations to treat and retrieve wounded and dead.

My question to that suggestion has been the same as when I was offered a job to work for DC Metro at our nation's capital and told I would be issued a bullet proof vest to wear on every shift, because gangs initiated by making false calls and ambushing responders.

The question I ask about sending medics into a gun fight, “Are you going to let them be armed?”

Ain't it funny how many times I hear, “Oh no we can’t let medics be armed!”

Needless to say I turned down the generous offer made by DC metro. And I am really not sure how I would react if I was in a situation where on shift I am called to be disarmed while facing a psychopath, or their slave who doesn't have any regard for the Rights of others while being only concerned about what makes them able to live with themselves.

With similar respect, I will also turn down any offer to reject my God as the source of Rights that you have to abuse freedom to assault Liberty with.

No, I won’t join you, and neither will any person in their Right mind.

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because He has anointed Me To preach the gospel to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives

And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed;

To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.”

Then He closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all who were in the synagogue were fixed on Him. And He began to say to them, “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” Luke 4:18-20